Friday, June 27, 2014

Pray and Get to Work

Myrtle Fillmore and Charles Fillmore co-founded the Unity movement during the last half of the 19th century. Mrs. Fillmore experienced a lifetime of poor health and achieved an extraordinary healing by using a very simple affirmation: “I am a child of God and therefore I do not inherit sickness.” Her husband, Mr. Fillmore watched her transformation, but remained skeptical for several years. He studied many religions and developed a unified theology ultimately called Unity. Compared to the simple faith of Myrtle, Charles seemed to make more of his theology than it needed. He searched for scientific terms and proofs that would make everyone believers. Myrtle’s theology used language that is very similar to the language I heard growing up as a Methodist. She probably didn’t worry in the same ways that our current crop of ministers do about specificity in language. Myrtle used her embedded theology with the modifications that made “Christian healing” work for her. There is something comforting in her language. Personally, I applied what I learned from Mrs. Fillmore after my earliest exposure because she was simple and direct. Sometimes, I would catch myself wondering why things were not different after so much praying and I remember that Myrtle said that we should not spend too much time in the silence. We should instead get out into the world and assume our prayers were answered. I recall some exasperation in her letters. She wrote that she couldn’t understand why a woman would stay with her alcoholic husband and keep writing letters with complaints. I suspect that she did not suffer fools or whining much. She relied on what she knew and believed and has a lively group of followers, including me.

A favorite quote that I remember is when she told a correspondent that she’d prayed about her predicament and needed to move on rather than worry about the answer. That simplicity attracts a behaviorist like myself. My graduate training relied on changing behavior rather than resolving psychological injuries. If someone was overweight, we worked on the issues that prevented exercise and healthy eating rather than searching for the childhood insult that led to the overeating. Myrtle says to pray and get to work. I suspect she wouldn’t worry too much about exactly where God is and how we should address him, her, or it. Just pray to what you understand, assume it’s answered, and move on. She knew that God was good and everywhere present and that was that — pretty simple. I am not suggesting her ideas weren’t revolutionary for her time, but since she used the language of her Methodist upbringing to communicate them and many could understand her.

As a collection of memories, the above may be completely wrong. I may have read Myrtle as a heroine in my story of redemption and modified her quotes to suit my experience and education. The truth is likely in-between. Mrs. Fillmore filled a void in my life as a plainspoken mother that trusted God and faith with her life because God and faith saved her life. Considering that I was barely one year sober and dealing with issues that I had not faced in 20 years of drinking, I didn’t have anything to lose by doing the same.

6 comments:

  1. This is beautifully written, Don, and portrays the Myrtle that I came to know as personally mine as well. No nonsense - yet full of heart. Direct - with a grace and poise that could not be denied - or missed. And an unshakeable faith. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for reminding me about Myrtle's tone of exasperation with some of those who wrote to her. She seemed to chastise people, if in a gentle way, about having to 'cooperate' with what she knew they should do. They had to do their part if they had any expectation of healing. Really appreciate what you wrote.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Don: A thoughtful and poignant testimony, well-anchored in Unity history and lore. I am especially surprised--delighted--that you immediately waded into the God-language controversy which is raging in some Unity circles today. Your answer seems to be that Myrtle was a pragmatist who used the available language of the day to convey her ideas in support of the healing practices she really wanted to emphasize. My question to you as a theologian is this: Brushing through the dust of the decades and acknowledging we bring (as you noted) embedded theologies to this study, what was Myrtle's actual doctrine of God? I have heard lots of people anachronistically project their 21st century panentheistic monism on her ideas, but when she spoke of God as Creator, what do you think she meant?

    This course doesn't require any specific answers about the kind of questions we shall consider, but it does require a hard look from the most objective perspective each of us can achieve. So, week one was introductions. Week two will be Myrtle's Doctrine of God. More to come. Check the assignments and forums.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Don, I really like how you connected all this with Unity's past. I remember reading that Myetle had many error thoughts about her health as she was growing up. She saw herself as sickly and an invalid. It's sort of reminds me of Job where he says. "The very things I have feared have come upon me."

    Myrtle is a very powerful example of how one can deal with one's ever thoughts. Just when I think that my list of error thoughts has become very short, some life situation shows me that much more work to do in this area.

    Dr. Tom wrote some very similar comments to my first blog concerning Myrtle's actual theology. I guess will have to be like Sherlock Holmes. I wonder if the clue to Myrtle's theology is"But the dogs didn't bar." (that was a key clue for one of Sherlocks major cases:)))))

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Don!
    I absolutely loved your interpretation and breakdown on Myrtle, her beliefs and especially this comment. "There is something comforting in her language. Personally, I applied what I learned from Mrs. Fillmore after my earliest exposure because she was simple and direct" Don't most of us want simple and direct communication? I too can appreciate when thing's are relayed to me in the simplest of forms. I agree with you! I had not thought about that angle of her communication before. I initially believed she just presented as loving and caring. Think I may be in for a few more discoveries this class.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Don,

    Thanks for your lovely thoughts. I find myself identifying with what you said about the difference between Myrtle's approach and Charles. My own leanings are more toward Charles' approach - looking for what lies behind the forces they found, the science and so forth. However, this class is causing me to make some shifts in my own spiritual approach. Thanks for illuminating some of them for me. -Doug

    ReplyDelete